Tuesday, June 25, 2013

After Supreme Court Ruling, Senate to Hold Hearings on Voting Rights Act Email 41 Smaller Font Text Larger Text | Print By Chris Good @c_good Follow on Twitter Jun 25, 2013 5:04pm 171496702 16x9 608 After Supreme Court Ruling, Senate to Hold Hearings on Voting Rights Act Credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images Now that the Supreme Court has kicked the Voting Rights Act over to Congress, Congress will take it up. The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings next month after the court on Tuesday invalidated the Voting Rights Act’s coverage formula, which determines which voting districts must gain pre-approval from the Department of Justice for voting policy and procedure changes. The court left standing Section 5, which requires states with histories of racial discrimination to seek such approval, only invalidating the formula that determines which districts fall under that provision. Congress last reauthorized the law in 2006. Read more about the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on voting rights. Now, it’s essentially up to Congress to re-write the formula.

Soccer : OXgraphics


Wednesday, August 15, 2012

The Real Ryan Record: 2 Minor Bills, Lots of High-Profile Talk, Gridlock

The Real Ryan Record: 2 Minor Bills, Lots of High-Profile Talk, Gridlock

The Real Ryan Record: 2 Minor Bills, Lots of High-Profile Talk, Gridlock

A lot of the coverage of Republican vice presidential pick Paul Ryan talks about how handsome he is. How thoughtful. How serious and substantive and what a genuinely nice guy.
After looking at his record, I'm going to have to agree with Jonathan Chait, who writes that Ryan's "public persona is a giant scam" that marks him as a "skillful pol" -- and also someone who ought not to be underestimated. But there's a big difference between manners and character, between ideologically rigid political posturing and a substantive commitment to the difficult work of creating positive change within a pluralistic and diverse democratic society. If people can no longer tell the one from the other it's because we now live in an age, as Ta-Nehisi Coates has so memorably noted, where "where counter-intuitive bullshitting is valorized, where the pose of argument is more important than the actual pursuit of truth, where clever answers take precedence over profound questions."